Introduction ACTP analysis

This would be an example to show what the audience would feel
when performing a presentation without a concrete, clear introduction.

Attension-getter: Average~Not good
The title of the presentation is very appealing. However, probably due to the time management, Katick started with just simply saying "Hi", and then moved to the topic directly. Although there is a very brief explanation about the dancing bear using a visual slide, this is not enough. As a concequent, even though I ended up with enjoying the presentation (because I love bears), I was little bit confused and took time to understand what the 'dancing bear' is all about, and its relating problems.


Credibility: Katick introduced the reseach on the bears that his group is undertaking since 1995; nevertheless, it is not quite helpful to build the credibility toward him among the audiences. He might have been introduced by the MC beforehand.


Topic: It is clear that his topic is 'dancing bear', but the problem is that the audiences, who are not familiar with his previous reseach, probably never heard of it. He should have explained about his topic more in detail.


Preview of points: Katick did not give the preview at all. Though it is a very short presentation, he could have given a very short list of points that he is going to talk about.